Introductory Remarks:
Everyone
reads the Bible for different reasons. Some read it from a
historical perspective, some read it from a critical perspective, some read it
out of obligation, and some read it because they believe it is the word of God. Inevitably,
how you approach the text will be the guiding factor of what you find
there. The Bible is a vast and complicated book. From my
personal experiences, when people set out to read or study the Bible, they
usually do so because they are searching for something. Like in all
matters of life, a person will usually find what they are looking for if they
are willing to search hard enough. This is no more or less true with
the Bible than any other text.
It is
for such reasons that the Bible has become such a widely debated and
controversial book. It is for such reasons that there are so many
different, sometimes conflicting, branches of the Christian
church. Just the number of denominations under the umbrella of
Protestantism is itself staggering. So, what does the Bible really
teach us? Is there just one answer, or are there many
answers? Is one interpretation more accurate than
another? Does one denomination or branch of Christianity hold more
relevance than others? These are all difficult questions to
answer. And, unfortunately the responses to any of these questions
will depend on the person providing the answers. For some there will
only be one correct interpretation and therefore only one correct answer, while
for others there may be a plurality of possible interpretations and therefore a
variety of different answers. In sum, different folks, different
strokes.
Like
many readers of the Bible, I grew up in the church. So, before I
even began to read the Christian scriptures on my own, my head was already
filled with stories, ideas, values, and beliefs. It is very
difficult to read any text in a different light than how one was taught or
trained. Accordingly, my experience has been that those who have
been taught or trained to adhere to traditional, contemporary Christian beliefs
usually, whether correctly or incorrectly, read those beliefs and values into
the text. This is not necessarily a fault; it is natural and to be
expected. Conversely, they often read over, or completely ignore, those
passages that don’t pertain to their chosen set of values or
beliefs. Such is human nature.
Understandably,
my personal journey has been an uphill battle. But, as I’ve have
grown older, as I have done my own serious scholarship, and as I have explored
the writings and beliefs of other religions, I have worked diligently to read
the Bible differently than how I was taught. In some sense, my goal
has been an impossible one, as I wanted to read the Bible from a completely
fresh perspective… outside the confines of the dogma or doctrine I had been
indoctrinated in since childhood. This isn’t necessarily because
such teachings were ‘wrong’ or even ‘ill received.’ More accurately,
my ongoing effort to approach the Bible differently is predicated on the
understanding that there is and always has been a plank, or blind spot, in mine
own eye, regardless of either doctrine or dogma.
Experience
has taught me that real learning begins by closely analyzing one’s own faults
and errors. It is for this reason that I have worked to read the
Bible ‘differently.’ Accordingly, the critical voice I offer in this
book could be understood, first and foremost, as a criticism of many of my own
beliefs, values, and even of the community that raised me. Yet, what
I have found from my years of teaching and studying various religions is that
the ‘truth’ one finds in any one particular religion typically begins with the
‘truth’ the individual is seeking and expecting. Knowing this I
attempted to approach different religious texts with the same expectations I
had when approaching the Bible. For
example, I began to read texts like The
Bhagavad Gita or The Upanishads
while seeking the same ‘truths’ I typically sought when I read the Bible.
The
exercise was illuminating. It was
therefore only a matter of time before I began to wonder, what if I read the
Bible like I traditionally read other religious texts, texts I believed were written
with an intent and purpose but did not expect to provide eternal answers or
divine truths. Would the Bible teach me the same ‘truths’ I already assumed it
taught? Would the main characters be the same? What would the moral
of the story be? When would the story reach its climax and when would it reach
its conclusion?
Most
modern scholars have learned to approach the Christian scriptures as a
narrative. As scholars have proven, the individual narratives found
throughout the books of the Bible are best understood when placed in the
context of the greater meta-narrative of the Bible itself. The
isolation of individual chapters, passages, and even verses often does an injustice
to the original writings and can, at times, do an injustice to the greater
story as well. Accordingly, it is my goal to follow scholarly
tradition and interpret all the books of the Bible as narratives in the broader
context of a larger meta-narrative. Yet, even a narrative approach to the
scriptures does not necessarily aim to read the Bible as purely mythic.
To be
sure, the two are closely connected and not mutually exclusive, but most
Christians read the Bible differently from how they read The Iliad or Beowulf. The
reasons for doing so are obvious as The
Iliad and Beowulf are
traditionally read by Christians as clear examples of fictional myths whereas
the Bible, on the other hand, is typically read and understood to be the
greatest non-fiction myth ever complied into written form. Yet, when
all the chips fall where they may and one cracks open their Bible and starts to
read, it is difficult to know where history ends and fiction
begins. After all, Jesus was known to teach in
parables. Is the truth found in these parables predicated on historical
facts? Must the Good Samaritan exist for Jesus’ parable to be
true? I think we can all agree the answer is no. The
truth lies in the story itself, not in the historical facts that do or do not
surround it.
In
short, what I have observed in my years of teaching is that when most people
read the writings of other, opposing religions they tend to read them as fiction;
they approach them with the assumption that what is to be found between the
covers is not to be believed as ‘factually true’ but is still worthy of
interest and general curiosity. This is interesting when one considers that,
for example, the city of Troy
existed, and it seems that it did once fall by the hands of the Greeks, not
unlike in Homer’s story.
Well,
what if I read the Bible in the same way? I concluded that such an
approach would not only expose how the Bible appears to all those living outside
the teachings found within the Christian tradition, it would also expose what
the Bible in fact does and does not say, regardless of history or tradition. It
is therefore my goal to take what some philosophers might refer to as a
‘phenomenological approach’ to reading the Bible. In short, my goal is to
bracket off all those questions that are impossible to answer such as which
manuscripts are the most accurate or which passages are to be trusted, and to
instead direct my focus on questions that can be answered. Simply
put, my goal is to answer the bigger questions: what is the central story found
in the Bible, and what does that story have to teach us?
My
answers to these two simple questions are provided in the pages of this
book. Some may be uncomfortable with the idea of reading the Bible
in such a way; yet, my experience is that when one approaches the text in this
way the contents of the scriptures take on a new and powerful
light. One’s attention is no longer diverted by questions of
doctrine, dogma, or traditional church teachings, and it is instead redirected
to the message of the story itself. This isn’t to say that there isn’t a place
for facts, textual accuracy, and even general historicism. In fact, my first book The Best Bible Study You’ve N/ever Had* addressed many such
problems, directly. It is just to say
that in this book, the second in my series on the Bible, such issues will be
considered but will not be at the forefront of my exploration.
It is
therefore worth noting: if you aren’t already aware, last year I compiled a
virtual, online Bible study into a book titled The Best Bible Study
You've N/ever Had. This book was to
function as the first installment of an ongoing series. The book did well, and as a result I have produced
the second volume in the series, which is the book you currently hold in your
hand. If you haven’t read my first
book, The Best Bible Study You’ve N/ever
Had, then I highly recommend you do, as it well help you to better
understand the writing of this one. With
that said, both books were written to stand alone, and they can therefore be
read independently from one another, as well.
Much
of the material that I addressed in my first book may have been challenging for
many readers as the conclusions I often arrived at did not always adhere to
traditional, contemporary Biblical teachings, and they probably would not be
welcomed in most conservative Evangelical communities. Although, it
is worth noting that my study was designed to focus on the Bible, and the Bible
alone. It therefore did not concern itself with the beliefs,
teachings, or values of the Evangelical Christian tradition, or any specific
Christian tradition throughout the ages.
This
was intentional. My goal was to take a ‘deconstructive’ look at the
Bible in hopes that by breaking down the scriptures into ten key areas (areas
based on ten basic quiz questions) I would then be able to expose many of the
issues, inconsistencies, and problems found within the scriptures
themselves. Inevitably this process also exposed many of the
problems found within common church teachings as well.
The Christian Church has been around
for a very long time. It has existed in many forms and has held many
different beliefs, values, and teachings throughout the centuries. Like in all
cases, the church is a product of its time, and it is also a product of those
who make up its body. In sum, the church, at any point in history,
only exists within the people who make up its congregations. As its
congregants go, so goes the church. This is no more or less true today than it
was 500 years ago during the Protestant Reformation. This fact alone
may be helpful for some readers to remember.
Nevertheless,
with any ‘deconstructive’ act the end goal is not destruction but construction.
It must be understood that any ‘deconstructive’ process moves in
waves. The building of ideas and beliefs is not unlike the building
of objects or buildings. In order to build something new, or perhaps to properly
rebuild something old, things must first be broken down and, at times,
destroyed. As a result, to some the initial wave, or movement, of
destruction may appear nihilistic, but this is a false precept. Dismantling
must occur first before rebuilding can occur, so while the first wave of
deconstruction may be destructive the second wave is always constructive.
Such
is the case with my first study and, in turn, my current study. In
short, my first book was written to breakdown or ‘destroy’ many of the common
misconceptions people in the church hold about the Bible. This second book is
being written to build up or ‘reconstruct’ what the Bible actually does have to
teach us. Now that the dismantling has begun, and readers now recognize that
many of their thoughts, perceptions, and beliefs about the Bible are skewed,
inaccurate, or false, reconstruction can begin.
Now we can address what this story actually has to offer.
This
new study, this new phase of exploration and reconstruction, shall be
called The Greatest Story You've N/ever Heard, and its aim is to
rebuild the Bible in hopes of discovering what its true message is. As noted
above, the ‘truth’ of this message will not be grounded in church creeds,
doctrines, dogma, or even in historical certainties; it will instead live
within the movement of the story itself.
As the story progresses, its teachings and truths will emerge. That is the message I hope to capture.
The Bible,
the stories of the Jewish god Yahweh, and the life, death, and
resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth have all had an enormous effect on the
world. Their influences throughout history are beyond compare and
even comprehension. Yet, like all stories, these stories have gotten
bogged down, watered down, and corrupted over time. It is my hope to
breathe some fresh life into them. It is my hope that be revisiting
these stories in a new (yet old) light, readers will see the real message
offered by the Bible. Some may disagree with many of the assessments
and conclusions I make. That is to be expected and welcomed. Like
in my previous book, I intend this new book to be a platform for discussion,
which encourages further research and scholarship for all parties
involved.
Hopefully
when readers have completed their reading of this new book they will have encountered
the Bible in a new, different, and hopefully more fruitful light. In
short, it is my hope that they will have heard The Greatest Story They’ve
N/ever Heard.
Following a similar vein as
last time, this book will be broken down into ten sub sections. Each
subsection will represent an individual chapter. The ten subsections are as
follows:
- The Emergence of Judaism (Abraham, Isaac,
and Jacob)
- The Flight from Egypt (Joseph, Moses, and
Aaron)
- Before the Kingdom (Joshua and the Judges)
- The Coming of the Kingdom (Samuel, Saul,
and David)
- The Building of the Temple (Solomon)
- The Diaspora & the Prophets (Jeremiah
and Daniel)
- The Second Temple Period (Ezra and
Nehemiah)
- The inter-Testament Period (1 and 2
Maccabees)
- The First Century and The Teachings of Jesus
(The Gospels)
- The Teachings of Paul and the future Church
of Christ (The Letters)
Epilogue: The Greatest Message You’ve N/ever Heard.
*My first book in this series, The Best Bible Study You've N/ever Had, which functions as
part one of my project, is currently available for sale. Please visit
Amazon.com and purchase your copy today.